You can also use a text editor to manipulate a. However, to avoid corrupting the file, be careful not to modify any binary information that is stored in the file. You can use the System. ResXResourceWriter class to create a. The file name must include the.
Close method in step 3. Call the ResXResourceWriter. AddResource method for each resource you want to add to the file. Use the overloads of this method to add string, object, and binary byte array data. If the resource is an object, it must be serializable. Close method to generate the resource file and to release all resources. If the ResXResourceWriter object was created within a using block, resources are written to the.
The resulting. AddResource method. The following example creates a. The Automobile class, which is defined and instantiated in the example, is tagged with the SerializableAttribute attribute. You can also use Visual Studio to create. You cannot embed a. You must convert your.
For more information, see Create resource files. In some cases, you may want to retrieve all resources, instead of a specific resource, from a. To do this, you can use the System. ResXResourceReader class, which provides an enumerator for all resources in the. The System. So our RESX file is ready, right? Now we can set some values in it. Now add a web page and go to the code behind by right-clicking then selecting view code.
What you need to do next is, add the necessary namespaces. You can determine them from the preceding code block. In the preceding code block we are setting our Resource file to the ResourceManager class. The function GetString is used to read the resource file properties. Figure 5: output. Did I miss anything that you may think which is needed? Could you find this post as useful? Improve this answer. Paulo Douglas 7 1 1 silver badge 6 6 bronze badges.
Daniel Lorenz Daniel Lorenz 3, 1 1 gold badge 30 30 silver badges 36 36 bronze badges. I believe that you can still use the ResXFileCodeGenerator to generate compile-time props as seen here for example: christianspecht. I did but then the culture change was ignored for me.
I found a workaround. I'm using a "BaseController" and two resx files: "Controllers. This class in inherited by my "true" controllers and I pass a "Text" var which contains the "IStringLocalizer" object with the translated string to the models again, I use a "BaseModel" for this. This is quite ugly, but this is as close as I wanted.
I also use a Constant class to not deal with the string keys, I hate that and we can always mistype something. I may write a blog post one day to explain this in a proper way. Mayako It looks like you need to call this instead in ASP.
NET Core 2: services. AddLocalization ; - I know it's probably too late for you but it might help others : — Llama. Beware of two "gotchas": 1 IStringLocalizer doesn't like short culture names.
It just didn't work with lv although current thread cultures and resource name was lv. It started to work when I renamed them all to lv-LV.
So, it's either namespace or ResourcesPath but not both. Show 5 more comments. Uwe Keim Popa Andrei Popa Andrei 2, 16 16 silver badges 22 22 bronze badges. Why would they do that? Now we have to use strings that will let you get run-time crashes So you usually won't get run-time crashes. A further benefit of this approach is that it forces you to be explicit about whether you want a string localizer or an html localizer. Beyond string vs. If you replace your unlocalized strings with similar strings e.
DanielLorenz: I agree with you; I prefer the designer approach which still works in. Net Core. The cost you pay for statically defining every resource string is that your resource class is tightly coupled with your application. That cost is incompatible with Microsoft's attempt to avoid all dependencies in favor of modular, injectable components. In the case of third-party libraries, avoiding coupling has substantial merit. In the case of application-specific localization, your translation is inherently coupled to your application, so tight coupling has minimal downsides.
The issue I have with the Microsoft implementation is that it's worse for people who need internationalization and isn't useful for people who don't need internationalization.
0コメント